Israel–Palestine

Genetic studies of Jews

A neutral control topic: the editions agree.

Candidate only — not a conclusion.

Overview

A neutral control topic: the editions agree.

Open current English Wikipedia article ↗

Layers on this page

  • Framing
  • Facts
  • Diff — no pivot found
  • Sources
  • Revisions

Edit-war intensity

low 4,471 conflict weight over 2,851 revisions.

Low mutual-revert activity — changes were not heavily fought. Context only — contested ≠ biased.

Current text: median age 6.7 yr · 19.5% authored in the last 3 years · top-10 editors wrote 65.7% of it (253 distinct editors). Descriptive context only.

Use the tabs for framing grids, fact tables, diffs, citation change, and revisions. Deep-link with #framing, #facts, #diff, #sources, #revisions.

How the editions frame it

How language editions frame the same subject (critical / neutral / sympathetic). Gaps are a signal to inspect, not a conclusion.

Across editions, the framing agree closely (divergence 0.00 on a 0–2 scale).

enhe
Jews
Israel

criticalneutralsympatheticabsent ! = departs from neutral · click a cell for the evidence quote

Across the rewrite. The editions differ, but roughly the same amount before and after the rewrite, so the difference looks inborn rather than introduced at a single moment.

Do the editions agree on facts?

Whether editions agree on load-bearing facts (counts, categories). Contradictions — especially ones later corrected — are worth checking.

factual questionnow
Do genetic studies indicate that major Jewish populations share common Middle Eastern / Levantine ancestry?agree
Both editions affirm shared Middle Eastern ancestry across Ashkenazi, Sephardi, and Mizrahi groups.
What do studies conclude about the ancestry of Ashkenazi Jews?differ
Both cite Middle Eastern plus European (esp. Southern European) admixture; en gives specific percentage ranges while he emphasizes no Khazar contribution, differing in detail/emphasis not fact.

Shared-source overlap (context only, skewed by edition language): now: 0.41.

What changed, and when

No confirmed pivot was detected for this article — L1 did not find a durable rewrite large enough to redline. Other layers (framing, facts, sources) may still apply.

What the sourcing changed

How the article's own citations changed from → to across the rewrite — domains added or dropped. Composition only; no source is rated.

2010-07-01 → 2023-01-01 (no L1 pivot — whole history). References 91 → 250; distinct domains 15 → 34.

Citation-type mix: journal 80%, web 9%, news 9%, book 2%  →  journal 60%, news 20%, book 12%, web 7%, report 1%, press 1%.

source added / grownfrom → to
jpost.com0 → 5
timesofisrael.com0 → 3
digitalcommons.wayne.edu0 → 3
in.reuters.com0 → 3
youtube.com0 → 2
haaretz.com0 → 2
albanytribune.com0 → 2
nytimes.com2 → 4
ghostarchive.org0 → 2
academia.edu0 → 2
science.org0 → 2
books.google.com0 → 1
source dropped / reducedfrom → to
nature.com2 → 0
familytreedna.com2 → 0
pqasb.pqarchiver.com1 → 0
pubmedcentral.nih.gov1 → 0
newsweek.com1 → 0
khazaria.com1 → 0
ftdna.com1 → 0
ashg.org1 → 0
cell.com1 → 0

Domains counted from citation markup (archive links unwrapped to the original source).

The exact Wikipedia revisions each finding was computed from, so anyone can verify. Wikidata Q3592613.

editiontitlerevisiontimestampprose
enGenetic studies of Jewsrev 13633930952026-07-09T22:56:29Z96,157
heמחקרים גנטיים על יהודיםrev 434659202026-06-21T10:07:15Z50,606