Israel–Palestine
Israeli–Palestinian conflict
1 factual question out of 2 contradicts across languages. 1 question out of 2 has a compatible detail difference.
Something to inspect — not a judgment of bias or bad faith.
Overview
Use this briefing to choose what to inspect. The tabs contain the underlying comparisons.
Open the live English Wikipedia article ↗L1 ran on this article and exact checking did not confirm a durable rewrite. This does not mean the article never changed.
Different websites cited: 131 → 135. We do not rate those sites. See Citations.
2 configured questions checked in more than one language. See Facts.
Did editors fight over it?
Editors spent a lot of energy undoing each other’s work (lots of reverts). A loud fight does not prove anyone is biased. About 9,420 recorded revisions in the measure.
Who wrote today’s text?
Half of the wording still on the page is about 1.9 years old or newer. 70.1% was written in the last 3 years. The ten most active accounts wrote 53.1% of what is there now (authorship is more spread out; 480 different accounts overall). Snapshot data on this page runs through 2026-01-01.This is background only — a small group of writers is common on specialist pages.
Available evidence: Rewrite (no candidate found), Vocabulary, Citations, Framing, Facts, Versions.
No candidate rewrite window was confirmed
The exact L1 check ran, but no candidate showed the required durable-spine drop. This is a completed negative result for that detector, not a claim that the article never changed.
Candidates and exact outcomes
The detector scored 23 interval rows and sent 2 candidate windows to exact checking: 0 confirmed, 2 rejected. A candidate window can span multiple interval rows, so rows marked as candidates do not equal the rewrite episode count.
Persistence-weighted changeThe share of wording lost, weighted so text that survived more snapshots counts more. by interval
Each row reports established wording lost, standing wording gained, and paired change as a replacement lead. The bar shows loss for continuity with earlier reports. Below-floor anomalies remain descriptive evidence but cannot receive exact confirmation. A coverage gap is shown descriptively but excluded from detector decisions. Candidate-window labels report the exact revision-level decision for the broader window containing that interval.
How the detector reached this state
- 1 · Coarse scanA snapshot comparison that finds candidate windows for closer inspection.Candidate signal foundThe coarse scan found a deletion-heavy window worth exact checking.
- 2 · Interval scoring23 intervals scoredThe bars below show persistence-weighted wording loss for each interval.
- 3 · Exact checkA revision-level test of whether a candidate window's durable spine collapsed.Candidates rejectedRevision-level checking did not find the required durable replacement.
- 2004-01-01Loss 88.9%3,671 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2005-01-01Loss 78.8%4,217 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2006-01-01Loss 15.0%616 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2007-01-01Loss 56.0%4,331 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2008-01-01Loss 32.7%3,254 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2009-01-01Loss 39.9%10,026 removed · 0 added PWRRejected candidate window: 2008-01-01 → 2011-01-01
- 2010-01-01Loss 25.2%9,749 removed · 0 added PWRRejected candidate window: 2008-01-01 → 2011-01-01
- 2011-01-01Loss 24.8%12,787 removed · 0 added PWRRejected candidate window: 2008-01-01 → 2011-01-01
- 2012-01-01Loss 4.6%3,090 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2013-01-01Loss 10.9%10,179 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2014-01-01Loss 3.0%3,644 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2015-01-01Loss 10.8%16,938 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2016-01-01Loss 1.0%1,877 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2017-01-01Loss 6.0%13,481 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2018-01-01Loss 1.9%4,727 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2019-01-01Loss 1.5%4,379 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2020-01-01Loss 0.4%1,352 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2021-01-01Loss 1.1%4,051 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2022-01-01Loss 0.8%3,239 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2023-01-01Loss 16.3%74,965 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2024-01-01Loss 13.8%60,080 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
- 2025-01-01Loss 37.6%163,585 removed · 0 added PWRRejected candidate window: 2024-01-01 → 2025-01-01
- 2026-01-01Loss 2.5%8,578 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
Exact candidate decisions
Every coarse lead and its revision-level decision, including rejected candidates. RedlinesA before-and-after view showing wording removed and added. compare the full candidate window.
| Candidate window | Exact outcome | Coarse signal |
|---|---|---|
| 2008-01-01 → 2011-01-01Redline unavailable | Rejected: 0.0% durable-spine drop, below the required 20.0%Exact pair: 2008-01-01T02:12:17Z → 2008-01-01T07:56:25Z | coarse interval · 40% persistence-weighted loss · 32,562 PWR massThe absolute persistence-weighted amount of text lost. |
| 2024-01-01 → 2025-01-01View redline | Rejected: 0.0% durable-spine drop, below the required 20.0%Exact pair: 2024-01-01T05:44:57Z → 2024-01-01T06:49:33Z | coarse interval · 38% persistence-weighted loss · 163,585 PWR massThe absolute persistence-weighted amount of text lost. |
Which words grew or shrank?
Words that became more common or less common between the compared versions. Handy for noticing a shift in topic or tone — not a score of bias.
Comparing 2003-12-11 -> 2003-12-12 (around L1 candidate date 2003-01-01; exact checking did not confirm a durable rewrite). Rough word count: 2,174 → 1,731. Overall: wording shifted a little.
Used more afterward
- zionists0 → 6
- main1 → 15
- movement0 → 3
- article2 → 14
- occupied2 → 6
- zionist2 → 6
- broke1 → 3
- carried1 → 3
- following1 → 3
- june1 → 3
- massacre1 → 3
- question1 → 3
Used less afterward
- often4 → 0
- civilians3 → 0
- favor3 → 0
- fedayeen3 → 0
- full3 → 0
- homes3 → 0
- immigrants3 → 0
- never3 → 0
- provisional3 → 0
- sometimes3 → 0
- themselves3 → 0
- usa3 → 0
These are the standout words, not a full dictionary of the article. Boring markup words are filtered out. Treat this as a hint, not a conclusion.
Which words grew or shrank?
Words that became more common or less common between the compared versions. Handy for noticing a shift in topic or tone — not a score of bias.
Comparing 2006-11-25 -> 2006-11-25 (around L1 candidate date 2006-01-01; exact checking did not confirm a durable rewrite). Rough word count: 2,079 → 1,762. Overall: small vocabulary change.
Used more afterward
- territories2 → 3
- occupied4 → 5
- palestinians21 → 22
- history16 → 15
- israel73 → 68
- state14 → 13
- peace24 → 22
- sites8 → 7
- gaza16 → 14
- israeli61 → 53
- human7 → 6
- jerusalem7 → 6
Used less afterward
- list6 → 0
- htm5 → 0
- aqsa4 → 0
- coexistence3 → 0
- cover3 → 0
- dommartin3 → 0
- front3 → 0
- liberation5 → 1
- attacks4 → 1
- suicide4 → 1
- accords3 → 1
- camp3 → 1
These are the standout words, not a full dictionary of the article. Boring markup words are filtered out. Treat this as a hint, not a conclusion.
Which words grew or shrank?
Words that became more common or less common between the compared versions. Handy for noticing a shift in topic or tone — not a score of bias.
Comparing 2024-08-12 -> 2024-08-12 (around L1 candidate date 2024-01-01; exact checking did not confirm a durable rewrite). Rough word count: 11,741 → 11,438. Overall: small vocabulary change.
Used more afterward
- often2 → 4
- involves1 → 2
- protected1 → 2
- reports1 → 2
- bypass2 → 3
- furthermore2 → 3
- roads2 → 3
- seriously2 → 3
- source2 → 3
- confiscation3 → 4
- creating3 → 4
- displacement3 → 4
Used less afterward
- settler10 → 3
- obama4 → 1
- stop3 → 1
- viewed3 → 1
- said4 → 2
- barack2 → 1
- breach2 → 1
- calling2 → 1
- communal2 → 1
- concessions2 → 1
- condemned2 → 1
- deep2 → 1
These are the standout words, not a full dictionary of the article. Boring markup words are filtered out. Treat this as a hint, not a conclusion.
How the footnotes changed
How the article's own footnotes changed across the rewrite: which websites and books were cited more or less. We only show the mix — we do not rate sources as good or bad.
Looking at 2023-01-01 → 2026-01-01 (across the L1 pivot ~2024-01-01): 84 websites were cited more (or newly), 49 less (or dropped). Number of footnotes: 350 → 490. Different websites: 131 → 135.
Mix of citation types: web 47%, news 34%, book 15%, journal 3%, report 0% → news 35%, book 34%, web 24%, journal 6%, report 1%.
| cited more often | before → after |
|---|---|
| books.google.com | 16 → 78 |
| haaretz.com | 13 → 29 |
| timesofisrael.com | 3 → 18 |
| theguardian.com | 6 → 18 |
| reuters.com | 3 → 14 |
| aljazeera.com | 5 → 15 |
| hrw.org | 3 → 13 |
| amnesty.org | 3 → 12 |
| nytimes.com | 4 → 12 |
| btselem.org | 3 → 10 |
| bbc.com | 0 → 6 |
| apnews.com | 0 → 6 |
| cited less often | before → after |
|---|---|
| mfa.gov.il | 22 → 2 |
| belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu | 8 → 2 |
| jcpa.org | 5 → 1 |
| articles.chicagotribune.com | 4 → 0 |
| assembly-weu.org | 2 → 0 |
| ue.eu.int | 2 → 0 |
| polisci.columbia.edu | 2 → 0 |
| wais.stanford.edu | 2 → 0 |
| unhcr.org | 2 → 0 |
| divinity.duke.edu | 2 → 0 |
| jewishfederations.org | 2 → 0 |
| independent.co.uk | 4 → 2 |
Counted from the article’s own footnotes. We list domains only — we do not call any source trustworthy or untrustworthy.
Cross-language lead comparison
How the opening of the article presents the topic in different languages. Disagreement is a reason to read carefully, not a final answer.
Insufficient matched historical content.
Compared matched historical revisions around the confirmed rewrite from 2002-07-01 to 2005-01-01.
Languages compared: en.
Version receipts: en: en before / en after
No comparison result is available for this run.
Cross-language lead comparison
How the opening of the article presents the topic in different languages. Disagreement is a reason to read carefully, not a final answer.
The English lead text was unchanged between the two revisions in this window, so there is no English-side temporal movement to report. Comparisons across editions show persistent, pre-existing differences: Arabic frames the topic as 'the Palestinian cause/Arab-Israeli conflict' with a historical-humanitarian scope from 1880, Hebrew frames it as a conflict between Jewish and Arab residents of the Land of Israel, and Japanese frames it as a political problem arising from relations between Palestinian settlers and Zionist Jewish settlers—all differing from the English framing of a two-sided but internally diverse conflict between the State of Israel and Palestinian Arabs. These differences existed both before and after the window in each edition, indicating persistence rather than convergence or divergence during this period.
Compared matched historical revisions around the confirmed rewrite from 2006-01-01 to 2007-07-01.
Languages compared: en, ar, he, ja.
Version receipts: en: en before / en after · ar: ar before / ar after · he: he before / he after · ja: ja before / ja after
| topic | how they compare | English change | other language(s) change | languages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Framing of the conflict's parties and nature | difference persisted | Before: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not a simple two-sided conflict with all Israelis (or even all Israeli Jews) sharing one point of view and all Palestinians another... some advocate a binational solution of a single secular state “some advocate a binational solution of a single secular state encompassing present-day Israel, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem” After: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not a simple two-sided conflict with all Israelis (or even all Israeli Jews) sharing one point of view and all Palestinians another... some advocate a binational solution of a single secular state “some advocate a binational solution of a single secular state encompassing present-day Israel, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem” | Before: القضية الفلسطينية او الصراع العربي الاسرائيلي مصطلح يشار به الى الخلاف السياسي والتاريخي والمشكلة الانسانية في فلسطين بدءا من عام 1880 وحتى يومنا الحالي “مصطلح يشار به الى الخلاف السياسي والتاريخي والمشكلة الانسانية في فلسطين بدءا من عام 1880 وحتى يومنا الحالي” After: القضية الفلسطينية او الصراع العربي الاسرائيلي مصطلح يشار به الى الخلاف السياسي والتاريخي والمشكلة الانسانية في فلسطين بدءا من عام 1880 وحتى يومنا الحالي “مصطلح يشار به الى الخلاف السياسي والتاريخي والمشكلة الانسانية في فلسطين بدءا من عام 1880 وحتى يومنا الحالي” | AR, HE, JA |
| Identification of conflict parties | difference persisted | Before: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a part of the greater Arab-Israeli conflict, is an ongoing conflict between the State of Israel and Palestinian Arabs “is an ongoing conflict between the State of Israel and Palestinian Arabs” After: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a part of the greater Arab-Israeli conflict, is an ongoing conflict between the State of Israel and Palestinian Arabs “is an ongoing conflict between the State of Israel and Palestinian Arabs” | Before: הסכסוך הישראלי-פלסטיני הוא הסכסוך המתקיים בין תושביה היהודים לתושביה הערבים של ארץ ישראל “הסכסוך המתקיים בין תושביה היהודים לתושביה הערבים של ארץ ישראל” After: הסכסוך הישראלי-פלסטיני הוא הסכסוך המתקיים בין תושביה היהודים לתושביה הערבים של ארץ ישראל “הסכסוך המתקיים בין תושביה היהודים לתושביה הערבים של ארץ ישראל” | HE |
| Framing as political vs. ethnic/settler conflict | difference persisted | Before: is an ongoing conflict between the State of Israel and Palestinian Arabs “is an ongoing conflict between the State of Israel and Palestinian Arabs” After: is an ongoing conflict between the State of Israel and Palestinian Arabs “is an ongoing conflict between the State of Israel and Palestinian Arabs” | Before: パレスチナ定住者（パレスチナ人）とシオニスト・ユダヤ人入植者との関係から生じた紛争を一個の政治問題として扱った呼称 “パレスチナ定住者（パレスチナ人）とシオニスト・ユダヤ人入植者との関係から生じた紛争を一個の政治問題として扱った呼称” After: パレスチナ定住者（パレスチナ人）とシオニスト・ユダヤ人入植者との関係から生じた紛争を一個の政治問題として扱った呼称 “パレスチナ定住者（パレスチナ人）とシオニスト・ユダヤ人入植者との関係から生じた紛争を一個の政治問題として扱った呼称” | JA |
Differences are invitations to read both sides — not a score of who is right.
Cross-language lead comparison
How the opening of the article presents the topic in different languages. Disagreement is a reason to read carefully, not a final answer.
The English lead's text was identical before and after the compared window, so no genuine temporal change occurred in English within these revisions. The Arabic, Hebrew, and Japanese leads were also unchanged in their respective before/after pairs. All identified divergences reflect pre-existing, persistent differences in framing (English's 'two state solution' and dual-actor framing vs. Arabic's historical/grievance-centered narrative, Hebrew's brief resident-based definition, and Japanese's settler-relation framing), none of which shifted during this period.
Compared matched historical revisions around the confirmed rewrite from 2008-01-01 to 2008-07-01.
Languages compared: en, ar, he, ja.
Version receipts: en: en before / en after · ar: ar before / ar after · he: he before / he after · ja: ja before / ja after
| topic | how they compare | English change | other language(s) change | languages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Framing of the conflict's nature and parties | difference persisted | Before: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is an ongoing dispute between the State of Israel and the Palestinians. It also forms part of the wider Arab-Israeli conflict. “The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is an ongoing dispute between the State of Israel and the Palestinians.” After: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is an ongoing dispute between the State of Israel and the Palestinians. It also forms part of the wider Arab-Israeli conflict. “The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is an ongoing dispute between the State of Israel and the Palestinians.” | Before: القضية الفلسطينية: بدأت أطماع اليهود الغربيين في الأراضي الفلسطينية من العصر الحديث منذ عام 1530 م... مصطلح يشار به إلى الخلاف السياسي والتاريخي والمشكلة الانسانية في فلسطين بدءا من عام 1880 “بدأت أطماع اليهود الغربيين في الأراضي الفلسطينية من العصر الحديث منذ عام 1530 م” After: القضية الفلسطينية: بدأت أطماع اليهود الغربيين في الأراضي الفلسطينية من العصر الحديث منذ عام 1530 م... مصطلح يشار به إلى الخلاف السياسي والتاريخي والمشكلة الانسانية في فلسطين بدءا من عام 1880 “بدأت أطماع اليهود الغربيين في الأراضي الفلسطينية من العصر الحديث منذ عام 1530 م” | AR, HE, JA |
| Description of Hebrew Wikipedia lead scope | difference persisted | Before: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is an ongoing dispute between the State of Israel and the Palestinians. “The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is an ongoing dispute between the State of Israel and the Palestinians.” After: The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is an ongoing dispute between the State of Israel and the Palestinians. “The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is an ongoing dispute between the State of Israel and the Palestinians.” | Before: הסכסוך הישראלי-פלסטיני הוא הסכסוך המתקיים בין תושביה היהודים לתושביה הערבים של ארץ ישראל. “הסכסוך הישראלי-פלסטיני הוא הסכסוך המתקיים בין תושביה היהודים לתושביה הערבים של ארץ ישראל.” After: הסכסוך הישראלי-פלסטיני הוא הסכסוך המתקיים בין תושביה היהודים לתושביה הערבים של ארץ ישראל. “הסכסוך הישראלי-פלסטיני הוא הסכסוך המתקיים בין תושביה היהודים לתושביה הערבים של ארץ ישראל.” | HE |
| Description of Japanese Wikipedia lead scope | difference persisted | Before: Many attempts have been made to broker a "two state solution," which would entail the creation of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel. “Many attempts have been made to broker a "two state solution," which would entail the creation of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel.” After: Many attempts have been made to broker a "two state solution," which would entail the creation of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel. “Many attempts have been made to broker a "two state solution," which would entail the creation of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel.” | Before: パレスチナ問題とは、パレスチナの地を巡るパレスチナ定住者（パレスチナ人）とイスラエル（シオニスト・ユダヤ人入植者ら）との関係から生じた紛争を一個の政治問題として扱った呼称。 “パレスチナ定住者（パレスチナ人）とイスラエル（シオニスト・ユダヤ人入植者ら）との関係から生じた紛争” After: パレスチナ問題とは、パレスチナの地を巡るパレスチナ定住者（パレスチナ人）とイスラエル（シオニスト・ユダヤ人入植者ら）との関係から生じた紛争を一個の政治問題として扱った呼称。 “パレスチナ定住者（パレスチナ人）とイスラエル（シオニスト・ユダヤ人入植者ら）との関係から生じた紛争” | JA |
Differences are invitations to read both sides — not a score of who is right.
Cross-language lead comparison
How the opening of the article presents the topic in different languages. Disagreement is a reason to read carefully, not a final answer.
The English, Arabic, Japanese, and Odia lead sections show no substantive textual change between the BEFORE and AFTER revisions in this window; the edits appear to be minor (e.g., a single non-breaking space added in Odia). The persistent cross-edition differences are structural: English frames the topic strictly as a land/self-determination conflict since the late 19th/early 20th century, while Arabic frames it as 'القضية الفلسطينية' rooted in 1897 and central to the broader Arab-Israeli conflict, a difference that predates and persists through this time window with no convergence or divergence detected.
Compared matched historical revisions around the confirmed rewrite from 2024-01-01 to 2025-01-01.
Languages compared: en, ar, ja, or.
Version receipts: en: en before / en after · ar: ar before / ar after · ja: ja before / ja after · or: or before / or after
| topic | how they compare | English change | other language(s) change | languages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Framing of the conflict's naming and history | difference persisted | Before: The Israeli–Palestinian conflict is an ongoing military and political conflict about land and self-determination within the territory of the former Mandatory Palestine. “an ongoing military and political conflict about land and self-determination within the territory of the former Mandatory Palestine” After: The Israeli–Palestinian conflict is an ongoing military and political conflict about land and self-determination within the territory of the former Mandatory Palestine. “an ongoing military and political conflict about land and self-determination within the territory of the former Mandatory Palestine” | Before: القضية الفلسطينية أو الصراع الفلسطيني الإسرائيلي مصطلح يشار به إلى الخلاف السياسي والتاريخي والمشكلة الإنسانية في فلسطين بدءاً من عام 1897 (المؤتمر الصهيوني الأول) وحتى الوقت الحالي. “مصطلح يشار به إلى الخلاف السياسي والتاريخي والمشكلة الإنسانية في فلسطين بدءاً من عام 1897” After: القضية الفلسطينية أو الصراع الفلسطيني الإسرائيلي مصطلح يشار به إلى الخلاف السياسي والتاريخي والمشكلة الإنسانية في فلسطين بدءاً من عام 1897 (المؤتمر الصهيوني الأول) وحتى الوقت الحالي. “مصطلح يشار به إلى الخلاف السياسي والتاريخي والمشكلة الإنسانية في فلسطين بدءاً من عام 1897” | AR |
| Centrality to broader Arab-Israeli conflict | difference persisted | Before: Key aspects of the conflict include the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the status of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements, borders, security, water rights, the permit regime, Palestinian freedom of movement, and the Palestinian right of return. “Key aspects of the conflict include the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the status of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements” After: Key aspects of the conflict include the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the status of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements, borders, security, water rights, the permit regime, Palestinian freedom of movement, and the Palestinian right of return. “Key aspects of the conflict include the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the status of Jerusalem, Israeli settlements” | Before: يُعتبر هذا النزاع، من قبل الكثير من المحللين والسياسيين القضية المركزية في الصراع العربي الإسرائيلي وسبب أزمة هذه المنطقة وتوترها. “no quotation” After: يُعتبر هذا النزاع، من قبل الكثير من المحللين والسياسيين القضية المركزية في الصراع العربي الإسرائيلي وسبب أزمة هذه المنطقة وتوترها. “no quotation” | AR |
Differences are invitations to read both sides — not a score of who is right.
Do the languages agree on basic facts?
Simple factual questions checked in several languages. Editions may agree, differ, contradict, or not say enough to tell. That is not a claim about who is right.
On the latest check, 2 questions produced: 0 contradict · 1 compatible difference · 0 agree · 1 not enough said.
| question | 2002-07-24 |
|---|---|
| When is the conflict said to have begun? | differ |
| Only English gives a specific year (1973); all other editions have no stated start date, so no contradiction, just differing detail. | |
| What are the core disputed issues the article lists (borders, Jerusalem, refugees, settlements)? | not enough said |
| No edition provides a clear list of core disputed issues; English only mentions settlements, others state nothing. | |
These checks are starting points for a reader. They do not decide who is right.
Do the languages agree on basic facts?
Simple factual questions checked in several languages. Editions may agree, differ, contradict, or not say enough to tell. That is not a claim about who is right.
On the latest check, 2 questions produced: 1 contradict · 1 compatible difference · 0 agree · 0 not enough said.
| question | 2006-06-11 |
|---|---|
| When is the conflict said to have begun? | contradict |
| Editions give incompatible start points/dates (1880s, 1948, British Mandate, WWI era) or state not stated, spanning a range too large to reconcile. | |
| What are the core disputed issues the article lists (borders, Jerusalem, refugees, settlements)? | differ |
| Most editions that address this agree on overlapping core issues (borders, Jerusalem, refugees, settlements) but vary in scope and additional details; several state not stated. | |
These checks are starting points for a reader. They do not decide who is right.
Do the languages agree on basic facts?
Simple factual questions checked in several languages. Editions may agree, differ, contradict, or not say enough to tell. That is not a claim about who is right.
On the latest check, 2 questions produced: 1 contradict · 1 compatible difference · 0 agree · 0 not enough said.
| question | 2008-03-25 |
|---|---|
| When is the conflict said to have begun? | contradict |
| Editions give incompatible start points ranging from 1880 to 1948, with many stating no date at all. | |
| What are the core disputed issues the article lists (borders, Jerusalem, refugees, settlements)? | differ |
| Most editions that specify issues include overlapping items (borders, Jerusalem, refugees, settlements) but vary in emphasis and completeness; some focus narrowly on refugees or Jerusalem while many state nothing. | |
These checks are starting points for a reader. They do not decide who is right.
Do the languages agree on basic facts?
Simple factual questions checked in several languages. Editions may agree, differ, contradict, or not say enough to tell. That is not a claim about who is right.
On the latest check, 2 questions produced: 1 contradict · 1 compatible difference · 0 agree · 0 not enough said.
| question | 2024-08-12 |
|---|---|
| When is the conflict said to have begun? | contradict |
| Editions cite widely different start dates ranging from 1860s to 1967, reflecting incompatible framings of the conflict's origin. | |
| What are the core disputed issues the article lists (borders, Jerusalem, refugees, settlements)? | differ |
| Most editions list overlapping core issues (borders, Jerusalem, refugees, settlements, security, water) with varying emphasis or additional items; a few (ko, ru, tr, pt, uk) state no defined list, which is a difference in scope rather than a direct factual contradiction. | |
These checks are starting points for a reader. They do not decide who is right.
Versions we used
These are the exact public Wikipedia versions behind the checks on this page. Open any link to read the original. Wikidata item: Q151622.
| language | comparison point | article title | version | when | text used (chars) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en | before | Israeli–Palestinian conflict | open version 1239968080 | 2024-08-12T19:05:51Z | 3,000 |
| en | after | Israeli–Palestinian conflict | open version 1239968974 | 2024-08-12T19:13:55Z | 3,000 |
| ar | before | القضية الفلسطينية | open version 67583936 | 2024-08-10T10:13:16Z | 1,691 |
| ar | after | القضية الفلسطينية | open version 67610958 | 2024-08-14T17:29:32Z | 1,691 |
| ja | before | パレスチナ問題 | open version 101304180 | 2024-07-31T08:36:14Z | 1,166 |
| ja | after | パレスチナ問題 | open version 101880864 | 2024-09-17T16:46:42Z | 1,166 |
| or | before | ଇସ୍ରାଏଲ-ପାଲେଷ୍ଟାଇନ ବିବାଦ | open version 539502 | 2024-05-07T06:53:02Z | 3,000 |
| or | after | ଇସ୍ରାଏଲ-ପାଲେଷ୍ଟାଇନ ବିବାଦ | open version 558335 | 2024-12-24T02:02:04Z | 3,000 |