Holocaust in Poland

Jedwabne pogrom

The editions currently state conflicting facts.

Candidate only — not a conclusion.

Overview

The editions currently state conflicting facts.

Open current English Wikipedia article ↗

Layers on this page

  • Framing
  • Facts
  • Diff — no pivot found
  • Sources
  • Revisions

Current text: median age 6.2 yr · 2.6% authored in the last 3 years · top-10 editors wrote 81.6% of it (139 distinct editors). Descriptive context only.

Use the tabs for framing grids, fact tables, diffs, citation change, and revisions. Deep-link with #framing, #facts, #diff, #sources, #revisions.

How the editions frame it

How language editions frame the same subject (critical / neutral / sympathetic). Gaps are a signal to inspect, not a conclusion.

Across editions, the framing agree closely (divergence 0.33 on a 0–2 scale).

enplde
Poland
Germany
Jews

criticalneutralsympatheticabsent ! = departs from neutral · click a cell for the evidence quote

Across the rewrite. The editions differ, but roughly the same amount before and after the rewrite, so the difference looks inborn rather than introduced at a single moment.

Do the editions agree on facts?

Whether editions agree on load-bearing facts (counts, categories). Contradictions — especially ones later corrected — are worth checking.

factual questionnow
How many Jews were killed in the Jedwabne pogrom?contradict
EN cites up to 1,600 (often cited figure) while DE gives at least 340 with a range of 300-400, a large numeric discrepancy; PL is vague ('several hundred') which is compatible with DE but not clearly with EN's higher figure.
Who carried out the killings — local Polish residents or German forces?agree
All three agree local Polish residents carried out the killings, with some form of German involvement/inspiration/coordination noted in each.
What was the role of the German authorities?differ
All acknowledge German involvement but differ in emphasis: EN stresses German ultimate control/coordination, PL frames Germans as inciters per Heydrich's policy, DE presents it as disputed among historians ranging from passive to active roles.

Shared-source overlap (context only, skewed by edition language): now: 0.03.

What changed, and when

No confirmed pivot was detected for this article — L1 did not find a durable rewrite large enough to redline. Other layers (framing, facts, sources) may still apply.

What the sourcing changed

How the article's own citations changed from → to across the rewrite — domains added or dropped. Composition only; no source is rated.

2018-07-01 → 2026-07-01 (across the L1 pivot ~2020-01-01). References 238 → 82; distinct domains 64 → 35.

Citation-type mix: book 33%, web 28%, journal 23%, news 16%  →  book 36%, web 24%, journal 21%, news 18%, report 1%.

source added / grownfrom → to
polin.pl1 → 5
archive.org0 → 3
bbc.com0 → 2
thetimes.com0 → 2
ww2.senat.pl0 → 2
theguardian.com2 → 3
spectator.org0 → 1
timesofisrael.com1 → 2
wilmatheater.org1 → 2
archiwum.thenews.pl0 → 1
latimes.com0 → 1
researchgate.net0 → 1
source dropped / reducedfrom → to
books.google.com16 → 6
books.google.ca6 → 0
myinternetarchive-recovery.blogspot.ca6 → 0
info-poland.buffalo.edu5 → 0
youtube.com3 → 0
ipn.gov.pl9 → 6
wiez.free.ngo.pl3 → 0
warsawvoice.pl3 → 0
polish-jewish-heritage.org2 → 0
glaukopis.pl2 → 0
wyborcza.pl2 → 0
books.google.co.il2 → 0

Domains counted from citation markup (archive links unwrapped to the original source).

The exact Wikipedia revisions each finding was computed from, so anyone can verify. Wikidata Q707547.

editiontitlerevisiontimestampprose
enJedwabne pogromrev 13571280392026-05-31T22:21:36Z39,826
plPogrom w Jedwabnemrev 799907982026-06-14T13:44:59Z37,333
deMassaker von Jedwabnerev 2681121892026-06-21T14:20:33Z19,293