Israel–Palestine

Nakba

The editions frame this differently, but it was not introduced by a single rewrite.

Candidate only — not a conclusion.

Overview

The editions frame this differently, but it was not introduced by a single rewrite.

Open current English Wikipedia article ↗

Layers on this page

  • Framing
  • Facts
  • Diff — no pivot found
  • Sources
  • Revisions

Edit-war intensity

low 0 conflict weight over 1,175 revisions.

Low mutual-revert activity — changes were not heavily fought. Context only — contested ≠ biased.

Current text: median age 2.4 yr · 91.2% authored in the last 3 years · top-10 editors wrote 90.6% of it (131 distinct editors). Descriptive context only.

Use the tabs for framing grids, fact tables, diffs, citation change, and revisions. Deep-link with #framing, #facts, #diff, #sources, #revisions.

How the editions frame it

How language editions frame the same subject (critical / neutral / sympathetic). Gaps are a signal to inspect, not a conclusion.

Across editions, the framing differ moderately (divergence 1.00 on a 0–2 scale).

enhear
Israel
Palestinians
Zionism

criticalneutralsympatheticabsent ! = departs from neutral · click a cell for the evidence quote

Across the rewrite. The editions differ, but roughly the same amount before and after the rewrite, so the difference looks inborn rather than introduced at a single moment.

Do the editions agree on facts?

Whether editions agree on load-bearing facts (counts, categories). Contradictions — especially ones later corrected — are worth checking.

factual questionnow
Approximately how many Palestinians were displaced?agree
All center on ~750,000; ranges overlap (he 650k-760k, ar 700k-750k).
Is the event described as ethnic cleansing?agree
All say yes; he attributes it specifically to Palestinian/critical scholarship.

Shared-source overlap (context only, skewed by edition language): now: 0.23.

What changed, and when

No confirmed pivot was detected for this article — L1 did not find a durable rewrite large enough to redline. Other layers (framing, facts, sources) may still apply.

What the sourcing changed

How the article's own citations changed from → to across the rewrite — domains added or dropped. Composition only; no source is rated.

2021-07-01 → 2026-07-01 (no L1 pivot — whole history). References 46 → 175; distinct domains 17 → 58.

Citation-type mix: book 63%, news 17%, web 13%, journal 7%  →  book 42%, journal 30%, web 16%, news 12%.

source added / grownfrom → to
books.google.com19 → 66
tandfonline.com0 → 10
btselem.org0 → 6
reuters.com0 → 5
haaretz.com2 → 6
mondoweiss.net0 → 4
timesofisrael.com0 → 4
jpost.com0 → 4
jstor.org4 → 7
theguardian.com0 → 3
amnesty.org0 → 2
link.springer.com0 → 2
source dropped / reducedfrom → to
un.org2 → 1
core.ac.uk1 → 0
i-p-o.org1 → 0
articles.latimes.com1 → 0
doi.org2 → 1

Domains counted from citation markup (archive links unwrapped to the original source).

The exact Wikipedia revisions each finding was computed from, so anyone can verify. Wikidata Q3266633.

editiontitlerevisiontimestampprose
enNakbarev 13627897342026-07-06T05:29:43Z37,505
heהנכבהrev 433919102026-06-09T13:36:50Z19,606
arالنكبةrev 754299252026-06-13T10:24:23Z55,014