← Back to all analyses

Other

Unmoved mover

The wording changed a lot over the full lifetime of the page (no single overhaul date stood out)

Something to inspect — not a judgment of bias or bad faith.

Overview

Use this briefing to choose what to inspect. The tabs contain the underlying comparisons.

Open the live English Wikipedia article ↗
Rewrite
Rewrite analysis has incomplete source coverage

The exact rewrite detector loaded 32 of 42 expected snapshots from the public revision history. It withholds the result rather than treating gaps in readable history as evidence.

Wording
wording changed a lot

Which words grew or shrank is listed under Vocabulary.

Available evidence: Vocabulary.

Not available in this export: Rewrite, Citations, Framing, Facts, Versions. Missing coverage is not a negative finding.

Rewrite analysis has incomplete source coverage

The exact rewrite detector loaded 32 of 42 expected snapshots from the public revision history. It withholds the result rather than treating gaps in readable history as evidence.

Persistence-weighted changeThe share of wording lost, weighted so text that survived more snapshots counts more. by interval

Each row reports established wording lost, standing wording gained, and paired change as a replacement lead. The bar shows loss for continuity with earlier reports. Below-floor anomalies remain descriptive evidence but cannot receive exact confirmation. A coverage gap is shown descriptively but excluded from detector decisions. Candidate-window labels report the exact revision-level decision for the broader window containing that interval.

How the detector reached this state

  1. 1 · Coarse scanA snapshot comparison that finds candidate windows for closer inspection.No mature covered intervalsReadable snapshots were scored descriptively, but no mature interval remained eligible for a detector decision.
  2. 2 · Interval scoring31 intervals scoredThe bars below show persistence-weighted wording loss for each interval.
  3. 3 · Exact checkA revision-level test of whether a candidate window's durable spine collapsed.UnavailableNo current revision-level decision can be published.
  • 2006-07-01Loss 18.9%30 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2007-01-01Loss 1.7%22 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2007-07-01Loss 62.3%1,515 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2008-01-01Loss 11.7%189 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2008-07-01Loss 0.5%11 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2009-01-01Loss 0.3%11 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2009-07-01Loss 16.4%779 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2010-01-01Loss 9.1%443 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2010-07-01Loss 2.5%156 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2011-01-01Loss 2.1%162 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2011-07-01Loss 23.2%2,034 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2012-01-01Loss 12.4%948 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2012-07-01Loss 0.1%12 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2018-01-01Loss 9.8%1,468 removed · 0 added PWRExcluded: missing source coverage
  • 2018-07-01Loss 0.5%81 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2019-01-01Loss 0.0%2 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2019-07-01Loss 0.1%37 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2020-01-01Loss 0.2%56 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2020-07-01Loss 0.2%70 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2021-01-01Loss 1.7%703 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2021-07-01Loss 0.2%84 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2022-01-01Loss 0.2%101 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2022-07-01Loss 0.6%333 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2023-01-01Loss 0.5%318 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2023-07-01Loss 0.5%356 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2024-01-01Loss 0.0%12 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2024-07-01Loss 0.3%241 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2025-01-01Loss 1.9%1,615 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2025-07-01Loss 0.2%194 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2026-01-01Loss 0.0%0 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed
  • 2026-07-01Loss 0.2%248 removed · 0 added PWRMeasured: no anomaly threshold crossed

Which words grew or shrank?

Words that became more common or less common between the compared versions. Handy for noticing a shift in topic or tone — not a score of bias.

Comparing 2006-01-01 -> 2026-07-01 (no L1 pivot — whole history). Rough word count: 51 → 1,066. Overall: wording changed a lot.

Used more afterward

  • god0 → 17
  • theology0 → 14

Used less afterward

  • composed1 → 2
  • moved1 → 2
  • itself1 → 3
  • only1 → 4
  • unmoved3 → 14
  • mover3 → 16
  • motion1 → 7
  • substance1 → 8
  • metaphysics1 → 9
  • physics1 → 9
  • according0 → 3
  • became0 → 3

These are the standout words, not a full dictionary of the article. Boring markup words are filtered out. Treat this as a hint, not a conclusion.